John S. Gulliver, July 14th, 1pm
Technology for stormwater treatment has different challenges from water treatment and wastewater treatment. First, the stormwater control measure needs to be applied throughout the watershed, such that maintenance is infrequent on these disperse practices. Second, the water to be treated tends to flow more infrequently than water or wastewater, resulting in a different paradigm for stormwater control measures. Still, much can be learned from water and wastewater treatment processes as long as these two challenges are taken into account, because stormwater treatment is, in comparison, in its infancy.
This talk will discuss three technologies (gismos) that have been developed for stormwater treatment to assist in the choice of stormwater control measures: first, a falling head infiltrometer that can be used to determine the saturated hydraulic conductivity at multiple locations simultaneously; second, a baffle that will turn a standard sump into a stormwater control device; third, an enhanced sand filter that will remove phosphate from stormwater runoff before it reaches the receiving water body. The challenges of stormwater treatment will be discussed en route.
Amanda Hess, May 28th, 12pm
The need to quantify the rates of evapotranspiration (ET) and infiltration in stormwater control measures (SCMs) is to properly accredit the systems’ volume reduction. At Villanova University, weighing lysimeters have been constructed to represent three different rain garden configurations in a side by side comparison of their ET and infiltration volume reduction potential. Two different soil media were implemented, as well as two different drainage regulation devices. The three lysimeters consist of native plants in a lined soil media basin with an underdrain that is attached to a drainage configuration.
Flow into the system is measured by a rain gage, soil moisture is measured through the soil column, and flow out of the system via ET and infiltration is measured to provide a comprehensive view of how water is moving through each of the systems. The monitoring system includes soil moistures meters located at 10 cm, 35 cm, and 65 cm depths in each lysimeter. Evapotranspiration loss is determined by a system mass balance via a tension load cell that measures the systems weight at 5 min intervals. Each lysimeter’s drainage regulation system is monitored for exfiltration with a custom-made flow rate device. To simulate the volume of rainfall a rain garden would obtain from the runoff of the surrounding catchment area, a distribution system that provides for a 5:1 and 10:1 impervious area: SCM area rainfall event was developed.
Kyle Johnson, May 12th, 12pm
Bioinfiltration stormwater control measures (SCM’s) perform volume reduction of stormwater runoff through both infiltration and evapotranspiration (ET) mechanisms. However, the current state of practice in field of stormwater is heavily-tailored towards crediting infiltration and using it as the primary mechanism from which sizing and other design considerations are based. In the natural hydrologic cycle, this is not necessarily the case – as volume reduction from ET depends on rainfall distribution and climate-sensitive parameters and can account for a significant percentage and, at times, the majority of volume reduction. While methods exist to estimate potential ET using climatological parameters, a water balance approach seeks to quantify actual ET performance though conservation of mass entering and leaving the system. Quantification of actual ET performance (for instance, during storm events of varying intensity or with varying site conditions) will help establish a better basis to account for ET and create conditions where the role of ET has a larger influence in SCM design.
The utilization of life cycle analysis (LCA) in the area of green infrastructure is becoming a developing practice. Research from Flynn (2011) showed that impacts vary greatly between the life cycle phases – construction, operational life, and decommissioning phases – and reinforced the recognition of stormwater goals being part of a larger picture. Considering the scale at which green infrastructure is being adopted today (Philadelphia Water Department’s Green City Clean Waters program is an appropriate example), the scale of life cycle impacts (or avoided impacts) becomes increasingly important. Selection, siting, and design of SCM’s depend greatly on site-specific goals and, in many cases, the cost of implementation. Applied at scale, the pairing of LCA findings with site-specific characteristics (property values, site conditions, non-stormwater-related goals, etc.) can help encourage more holistic decision-making in the field of green infrastructure. A preliminary case study for bioinfiltration SCMs shows that the role and valuation of ET in green infrastructure design carries potential to significantly influence these costs and associated impacts.
Gerald Zaremba, April 23rd, 12pm
Green roofs are often times under credited for stormwater volume reduction. However research has shown that volume reduction due to evapotranspiration (ET) can account for a significant portion of the water balance. Villanova’s Green Roof was constructed in the summer of 2006 atop the Center for Engineering Education and Research, and has been continuously monitored since 2009. Past research has focused on quantifying potential ET from an un-drained weighing lysimeter on the roof. With the installation and calibration of outflow measuring instrumentation, future investigations will focus on comparing the ET measurements of the lysimeter to the performance of the entire green roof with a drainage system. Using preliminary data for over 4 months, including data from more than 10 storms of varying size, analysis has shown very similar water balances for both the green roof and the lysimeter.
Conor Lewellyn, April 9th, 12pm.
Quantifying the Flow of Rainfall Runoff through Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) in Series
There has been limited research performed to measure the effects and performance of SCMs in series. As a result, in 2011, Villanova University constructed a treatment train which combines four SCMs to study the quantitative hydrologic and water quality effect on rainfall runoff of SCMs in series. The treatment train includes a vegetative swale, two rain gardens in series, and an infiltration trench. Research at the treatment train continues to focus on accurately quantifying the flow of rainfall runoff through the system. New instrumentation has been tested and implemented to provide accurate rainfall runoff inflow to the system. Further research will focus on accurately quantifying outflow of the system, as well as individual performance of SCMs in the system.
Andrew J Quinn, April 1st, 1pm.
The Feasibility and Potential of Native Algae as a Tool for Bioremediation and Biofuel Feedstock
A yearlong study demonstrated the potential of native algae for bioremediation and biofuel production in the Villanova Constructed Stormwater Wetlands and Dundale Pond. The algae have been shown to play a key role in the removal of both inorganic nitrogen and inorganic phosphorus that enter the system. This study also visually demonstrated the existence of a frequent growth and flush cycle. During low flow conditions, algae growth is accelerated by the mild current, raised temperatures and low depth. These periods of low flow are occasionally interrupted by storm events that can raise the water level of the wetland several feet. These high flow storm events eliminate most of the algae in the wetland, carrying organics, nutrients and their BOD downstream. To analyze the potential of these algae as a biofuel feedstock, a proximate analysis of the algae samples was completed. The lipid, volatile matter, lignin and ash content was compared to current commercial grade algae species and the prominent algae found in the wetland forebay was found to be similar in composition. In addition, fast pyrolysis was completed to characterize the algae by identifying its chemical composition. These tests provide evidence that the native alga most at risk for the growth and flush cycle is also the species most suitable for biofuel conversion. Therefore, there may be potential for a stormwater style system that optimizes algal growth and that collects biomass as a biofuel feedstock before export.
Evgeny Nemirovsky, March 26th, 12pm.
Rain gardens use natural processes, such as infiltration and evapotranspiration, to control runoff from rain events. Although prior research has shown that rain gardens are effective at controlling the volume of runoff and pollutants associated with runoff, the extent of ground water mounding under rain gardens remains a concern for landowners, practitioners, and regulators. A rain garden on Villanova University’s campus was instrumented with monitoring wells to observe the influence of the rain garden on the water table. This rain garden receives the runoff from approximately 0.52 ha that consists of grassy areas as well as parking lots. In this presentation we will discuss the vertical and lateral behavior of localized mounding caused by infiltration in our rain garden subsequent to a storm event. The data used for the analysis was selected from one-and-a-half years of continuous monitoring at the site. A statistical model was developed, describing event-based peak ground water rise as a function of radial distance from the rain garden’s center and infiltrated water depth. Statistical analysis was performed to demonstrate significance of the model parameters. Analysis of time to peak and time to dissipate was performed. The system exhibited a very pronounced dissipation behavior in peak rise, normalized to infiltrated depth of water, with increase in radial distance. Temporal lag in mounding peak and dissipation was investigated with respect to radial distance. In light of the observed behavior, a methodology for estimating site-specific vertical and lateral impact was proposed. The methodology was applied to the rain garden, and the results reviewed in the context of geo-specific design storm.
Ashley Neptune, March 14th, 2014, 12pm.
Villanova University's Constructed Stormwater Wetland was recently reconstructed in 2010 to improve treatment efficiency by adding meanders to hold runoff in the treatment system longer. Water quality and quantity is measured throughout the year to monitor treatment performance. Further, dye tracer tests are being done to estimate the hydraulic residence time on a seasonal basis and for different flow conditions. Having a better understanding of system hydraulics will enable an improved stormwater sampling protocol and understanding of overall system performance.
For all other recent talks, click here to got to the catalog.
PDH - As per Pennsylvania's PE Act 25 Section 4.5c (d) (iv) One hour of professional development in course work, seminars or professional, technical presentations made at meetings, employer-sponsored courses, conventions or conferences shall equal one PDH unit. Note that it is the applicant’s responsibility to track their participation. This form is provided for your convenience.
VUSP is one of the five reserach areas that constitute the Villanova Center for the Advancement of Sustainability in Engineering (VCASE).
VCASE hosts lecture series during Fall and Spring semesters and invites external people to give a talk related to sustainability issues. One can view these talks either online or can plan to attend in person.
To view abstracts and speaker bios, click here.
Urban Stormwater Management in the United States - The National Academies Press, 2008.
Sustainable Stormwater Research - January 2013- NJ-ASLA.
NYC Monitoring Workshop Nov 2012 - The presentations below are from a workshop that the VUSP faculty held for NYC Neighbors, and from the national 319 Symposium
Dr. Robert Traver - Monitoring Introduction
Dr. Bridget Wadzuk - Evapotranspiration in SCMs
Dr. Andrea Welker - Mitigating High Temperature Inflows
Dr John Komlos - Nutrient and Metals Removal in in a Bio-infiltration SCM
Dr. Robert Traver - Monitoring Technology